MATTERHORN Trial Summary: Mitral Valve Repair vs. Surgery in Secondary MR

matterhorn trial mitral valve

The MATTERHORN trial, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, investigates the efficacy of transcatheter repair (M-TEER) versus surgical mitral-valve repair for secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with heart failure. This randomized controlled trial included 208 patients, equally divided between the intervention group (M-TEER) and the surgery group.

Key Findings:

  • Primary Outcome: The composite outcome of death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, stroke, valve reintervention, or assist device implantation at 1 year was 16.7% for the M-TEER group compared to 22.5% for the surgery group. The P-value for noninferiority was <0.001, indicating M-TEER was noninferior to surgery.
  • Major Adverse Events: At 30 days post-procedure, major adverse events were significantly lower in the M-TEER group (14.9%) versus the surgery group (54.8%) (P < 0.001).
  • Secondary Outcomes:
  • Recurrence of grade 3+ or 4+ MR at 1 year was higher in the M-TEER group (8.9%) compared to the surgery group (1.5%), with a noninferiority P-value of 0.02.
  • All-cause mortality at 1 year was 8.1% in the M-TEER group versus 11.2% in the surgery group.

Conclusion:

Among patients with heart failure and secondary MR, M-TEER demonstrated noninferiority to surgery with respect to a composite of death, rehospitalization for heart failure, stroke, reintervention, or assist device implantation at 1 year. M-TEER also showed a significantly lower rate of major adverse events within 30 days post-procedure, although it was associated with a slightly higher recurrence of MR at 1 year.

This trial highlights the potential of M-TEER as a less invasive yet effective alternative to surgery for patients with secondary mitral regurgitation, particularly in reducing early procedural risks.

Download the Visualmed app to access more than 1,500 such landmark clinical trial summaries

Comments are closed.